Causal Argument On Affirmative Action

CAUSAL ARGUMENT ONAFFIRMATIVE ACTION2005Inequalities , unfairness , racial separation , and separationism , to piddle a few , atomic number 18 common dustup that we lots hear in our daily activities to describe the rest in treating one to another . The inequalities might come in different forms and it happens not solitary(prenominal) in the working surroundings (offices , firms , etc ) but in any case in our homes when we love our daughters than boys or in education validations when we select students based on ethnicity rather than on the capability , for in placeConcerning the race in education system , the U .S . Supreme mash on June 23 , 2003 yieldd a shore decision involving admissions policies at the University of Michigan and its law indoctrinate that show have far-reaching implications for American high educ ation for years to comeIn twain decisions involving the cases of Gratz v . Bollinger and Grutter v . Bollinger , the supreme apostrophize not solitary(prenominal) upheld racial and ethnic diversity as a make water state interest at the University of Michigan but excessively reaffirm the importance of giving whole colleges and universities flexibility in the admissions process University of Michigan and Affirmative serve , 2003In Grutter , it upheld the law crop program that sought a critical mass of minorities by a 5 to 4 vote , with Justice Sandra twenty-four minute of arcs O Connor siding with the majority to decide the case . The court of law split six to three in Gratz to find the undergraduate program unconstitutional , with Chief Justice William H . Rehnquist spell the majority opinion come University of Michigan and Affirmative follow up , 2003The question of the legality of the University of Michigan s affirmative fulfill policies has back up the nation s set off because its opponents are arguin! g that the programs are disable because they violate federal law which applies equ bothy in each states at bottom the U .S . It is the University of Michigan s position that its policies are licit and that they are the best options available to it for increasing diversity in higher education .

Even if the University of Michigan altered its affirmative consummation policies , it would not end the argument as gigantic as other human race universities and private universities that accept federal funds maintain affirmative follow through programs (Fox News , 2003In this stance , we might raise two questions r egarding the case of affirmative action in the University of Michigan . First , whether the use of race issue as criterion in the admission process is shelter valid in today s education system . hour , what kind of admission structure that meets the needs of an educational organization and the federal law in to avoid conflict with the court s prohibition against quotasConcerning the first issue , the U .S . Supreme tourist court has long recognized that `education is the very foundation of right citizenship . For this reason , the diffusion of knowledge and opportunity through semipublic institutions of higher education must be accessible to all individuals regardless of race or ethnicity (Fox News , 2003The decisions made by the Supreme Court regarding the case of affirmative action in University of...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our p age: write my paper